Una impúdica cadena de mentiras

Piezas, Gong duruo y Andaqueno, comentaristas de Escolar.net, han traducido y subtitulado la entrevista de Aznar en la BBC de la que hablé el otro día. Ya no hay excusas. Yu nou, nau, ol de cuestions...



Actualizado el 9 de Agosto. Han borrado el vídeo que puse el otro día. Alguien a quien no le gusta que se sepa lo que dice Aznar en esta entrevista se ha encargado de quitarlo de Google Video, pero todavía se puede ver en Youtube. Está dividido en tres partes.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8coPjZzNSY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwe2lF3s6EQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zZdnrVmXQH4

No me extraña que no quieran darle publicidad. La estrategia es ésta:

Jaime Ignacio del Burgo, ayer en el Congreso. El Partido Popular no ha hablado jamás de conspiración, ni de que ETA estaba en el atentado, no lo hemos afirmado
Jose María Aznar en la entrevista. Precisamente las pruebas aparecidas en el último mes, en estos días, indican la más que posible participación de la ETA el grupo terrorista en este ataque, precisamente

La entrevista continuaba así:

Stephen. Let me continue... Prime Minister Zapatero told the Parlamentary Comission of Enquiry, and I quote: ‘We now know objectively there was not a single piece of data pointing to ETA’s involvement. It was a deceit,’ -he means your pointing to ETA was a deceit-, ‘a massive deceit on Spanish people.’

Aznar. Well, this is the... the words of the... current Prime Minister in Spain, no? I think, I understand that it’s better for example surrender... at terrorist, at fighting terrorism, no? This is one of the policy of the Current Prime Minister of Spain, Mr Zapatero, eh? And he negotiates in this moment with the terrorist... of ETA

Stephen. You know as well as I know

Aznar. The truth is that one of the first persons, one of the first political leaders, that blamed to ETR to be responsible of the attacks of 11M was Mr Zapatero. One. The most important. At the 9:00 of this morning. But the question is, the objective of this terrorist, was to provoke a situation to change government. This is the first question. The elections was on 14M. If the election was on 7M, the attacks would be always three days before. but the objective is to change government.

Stephen. The point of the issue is how you handled the situation between 11M and 14M. People have a right to judge you and your government. How they handled it. An they saw you not just for a few hours, but for several days, continuing to point the finger at ETA. I they also looked at...

Aznar. For one reason very clear. Because the police service, the Intelligence services, established that in their bureau the responsabilities is for ETA, is no for another interests, but once appear another elements the government inmediately, inmediately give this element to the opinion public. Inmediately.